|
課程資訊 |
|
課程名稱 |
競爭法與智慧財產法專研四 Seminar on Competition Law and Intellectual Property Law (Ⅳ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
開課學期 |
106-2 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
授課對象 |
法律學院 法律研究所 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
授課教師 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
課號 |
LAW7424 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
課程識別碼 |
A21 M8340 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
班次 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
學分 |
2.0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
全/半年 |
半年 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
必/選修 |
選修 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
上課時間 |
星期一8,9(15:30~17:20) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
上課地點 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
備註 |
教室在法研5。 總人數上限：15人 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Ceiba 課程網頁 |
http://ceiba.ntu.edu.tw/1062AT_IP4 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
課程簡介影片 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
核心能力關聯 |
核心能力與課程規劃關聯圖 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
課程大綱
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
為確保您我的權利,請尊重智慧財產權及不得非法影印
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
課程概述 |
本課程於本學期中，將有重大轉變。從最近人工智慧的興起以及其對於現行法律、倫理、社會等的挑戰出發，逐漸探討人工智慧對於現今各種法律領域所帶來的衝擊和挑戰。究竟人工智慧可不可以擬人化，進而享有法人格地位而成為各項法規範的權利及義務主體，從而改變各該法規範現行規範基本模式，將是未來10年人工智慧發展對於法律所帶來的重要挑戰。在我國科技部門主管機關傾全力發展人工智慧的目標下，我國法未來應如何配合此一科技發展適當調整，並配合國際發展趨勢而與國際法律規範調和，令法規範不致成為人工智慧科技發展之障礙，當是未來人工智慧法律相關研究的重要課題。
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
課程目標 |
本課程將循序漸進由人工智慧科技發展對未來社會、經濟生活的影響、法規範對此科技衝擊應有的基本對應方針及理念、人工智慧的公共政策、倫理議題、人工智慧法研究的必要性、人工智慧是否應享有法人格、人工智慧科技發展與隱私權保護、無人駕駛車相關法律議題、人工智慧與消費者保護、人工智慧的競爭法議題、人工智慧與金融科技創新及公司治理、人工智慧的智慧財產法議題、人工智慧對於刑法、行政法之挑戰、人工智慧對於未來法律職業的影響等之概觀，逐步理解人工智慧對於現行法規範所可能帶來的各種衝擊。 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
課程要求 |
鑑於本課程並無一本統一的教科書可資參考，且國內可資參考資料幾乎欠缺，因此同學們將藉由外國文獻的閱讀及報告，逐次了解本課程之內容。於外國文獻之閱讀及報告上，將可能產生相當程度的負擔，同學必須確定對於本課程有強烈的興趣及學習欲望，並可配合本課程之進度閱讀相關文獻，方建議選修本課程。 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
預期每週課後學習時數 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Office Hours |
每週三 15:00~17:00 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
指定閱讀 |
JERRY KAPLAN, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE - WHAT EVERYONE NEEDS TO KNOW (2016). | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
參考書目 |
Ryan Calo, A. Michael Froomkin, and Ian Kerr (eds), Robot Law (2016).
Ugo Pagallo, The Laws of Robots: Crimes, Contracts, and Torts (2013). | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
評量方式 (僅供參考) |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
課程進度 |
|
週次 |
日期 |
單元主題 |
|
第1週 |
課程內容介紹及未來課程實施之具體作法 | |
|
第2週 |
人工智慧的法律、倫理及社會議題概述 | |
|
第3週 |
Stanford University, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND LIFE IN 2030: ONE HUNDRED YEAR STUDY ON ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; Executive Office of the President National Science and Technology Council Committee on Technology, PREPARING FOR THE FUTURE OF ARTIFICIAL INETLLIGENCE | |
|
第4週 |
Adam Thierer, Andrea Castillo O’Sullivan, and Raymond Russell, Artificial Intelligence and Public Policy; Erik Vermeulen, Mark Fenwick, and Wulf A. Kaal, Regulation Tomorrow: What Happens when Technology is Faster than the Law? | |
|
第5週 |
Ryan Calo, Robotics and the Lessons of Cyberlaw; Jack M. Balkin, The Path of Robotics Law; Urs Gasser and Virgilio A.F. Almeida, A Layered Model for AI Governance | |
|
第6週 |
學校規定之休假日 | |
|
第7週 |
Lawrence B. Solum, Legal Personhood for Artificial Intelligences; F. Patrick Hubbard, DO ANDROIDS DREAM?: PERSONHOOD AND INTELLIGENT ARTIFACTS | |
|
第8週 |
Jack M. Balkin, The Three Laws of Robotics in the Age of Big Data; CHIP STEWART, DO ANDROIDS DREAM OF ELECTRIC FREE SPEECH? VISIONS OF THE FUTURE OF COPYRIGHT, PRIVACY AND THE FIRST AMENDMENT IN SCIENCE FICTION | |
|
第9週 |
Harry Surden, Technological Opacity, Predictability, and Self-Driving Cars; American Association for Justice, DRIVEN TO SAFETY: ROBOT CARS AND THE FUTURE OF LIABILITY; Guido Noto La Diega, The European strategy on robotics and artificial intelligence: too much ethics, too little security | |
|
第10週 |
M. Ryan Calo, Robots and Privacy; Sandra Wachter, Brent Mittelstadt, Luciano Floridi, Why a right to explanation of automated decision-making does not exist in the General Data Protection Regulation | |
|
第11週 |
Ryan Calo, Digital Market Manipulation; Ryan Calo & Alex Rosenblat, THE TAKING ECONOMY: UBER, INFORMATION, AND POWER | |
|
第12週 |
Maurice E. Stucke & Ariel Ezrachi, Artificial Intelligence & Collusion: When Computers Inhibit Competition; D. Daniel Sokol & Roisin Comerford, ANTITRUST AND REGULATING BIG DATA; Ashwin Ittoo and Nicolas Petit, Algorithmic Pricing Agents and Tacit Collusion: A Technological Perspective | |
|
第13週 |
DIRK A. ZETZSCHE, et al., From FinTech to TechFin: The Regulatory Challenges of Data-Driven Finance; Florian Möslein, Robots in the Boardroom: Artificial Intelligence and Corporate Law | |
|
第14週 |
SHLOMIT YANISKY RAVID AND XIAOQIONG (JACKIE) LIU, When Artificial Intelligence Systems Produce Inventions: The 3A Era and an Alternative Model for Patent Law; Shlomit Yanisky Ravid and Samuel Moorhead, Generating Rembrandt: Artificial Intelligence, Accountability and Copyright - The Human-Like Workers Are Already Here - A New Model | |
|
第15週 |
Benjamin L. W. Sobel , Artificial Intelligence's Fair Use Crisis; Amanda Levendowski, HOW COPYRIGHT LAW CAN FIX ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE’S IMPLICIT BIAS PROBLEM | |
|
第16週 |
Gabriel Hallevy, The Criminal Liability of Artificial Intelligence Entities; CARY COGLIANESE AND DAVID LEHR, Regulating by Robot: Administrative Decision Making in the Machine-Learning Era | |
|
第17週 |
端午節放假 | |
|
第18週 |
Jan L. Jacobowitz and Justin Ortiz, Happy Birthday Siri! Dialing in Legal Ethics for Artificial Intelligence, Smart Phones, and Real Time Lawyers; Mark McKamey, Legal Technology - Artificial Intelligence and the Future of Law Practice; Philip Segal, Legal Jobs in the Age of Artificial Intelligence: Moving from Today’s Limited Universe of Data Toward the Great Beyond |